Latest Update: As of July 11, 2026, the most recent confirmed development in this case dates to December 16, 2025, when the New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division vacated a trial court order that had allowed a Missouri attorney to solicit mass opt-outs from the settlement through an online retainer form. The appeals panel found the trial court failed to justify overriding the settlement’s explicit ban on “mass” opt-outs and sent the issue back to the trial court for a more detailed ruling. The decision effectively shields the settlement from large-scale departures by class members. No further public developments have been confirmed since that ruling, and the claim window remains permanently closed to new filers.
Last updated: July 2026
Verizon agreed to a $100 million class action settlement over undisclosed administrative fees charged to postpaid wireless customers between 2016 and 2023. The claim window has closed, payments have gone out, and millions of customers got far less than they expected.
This guide covers every detail of the Verizon class action lawsuit settlement. You’ll learn who qualified, what the fees were, why payouts were tiny, and what Verizon’s billing looks like today.
According to court documents, payments began distribution to approximately 5.2 million class members on January 6, 2025. Most people received between $4 and $14. Some got as little as $2.37.
Here’s the full story.
What Is the Verizon Class Action Lawsuit Settlement?
The Verizon class action lawsuit settlement is a $100 million legal resolution between Verizon Wireless and millions of its current and former postpaid customers. The plaintiffs alleged that Cellco Partnership, doing business as Verizon Wireless, unfairly charged fees to customers who purchased postpaid wireless service plans, specifically a monthly administrative charge that was not originally part of the advertised service plan price.
The lawsuit is known as Esposito et al. v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Docket No. MID-L-6360-23, overseen by the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey.
Verizon denied wrongdoing throughout the process. The company agreed to settle to avoid prolonged litigation costs, not because it admitted any legal violation.
| Settlement Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Case Name | Esposito et al. v. Cellco Partnership |
| Court | Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County |
| Docket Number | MID-L-6360-23 |
| Total Settlement Fund | $100 million |
| Covered Period | January 1, 2016 to November 8, 2023 |
| Claim Deadline | April 15, 2024 |
| Settlement Effective Date | September 20, 2024 |
| Payment Distribution Began | January 6, 2025 |
What Were Verizon’s Administrative Charges?
Verizon began charging the administrative charge on its postpaid wireless customers’ bills in 2005, starting at a rate of 40 cents per month, increasing on a regular basis to $3.30 per line per month, more than eight times the original amount.
The problem wasn’t that the fee existed. It was that customers said they never saw it coming when they signed up.

At issue was Verizon’s “administrative charge,” which the plaintiffs said were “misleading” because that fee wasn’t disclosed in their plan’s advertised monthly price and were charged in a “deceptive and unfair manner.”
Verizon pushed back. A company spokesperson said the charge “helps our company recover certain regulatory compliance and network related costs.”
| Fee Type | Rate (at peak) | What Verizon Said It Was For |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative Charge | Up to $3.30/month/line | Regulatory compliance, network costs |
| Telco Recovery Charge | Variable | Telecom operational costs |
| Combined Impact | $40+ per year per line (for longtime customers) | Not disclosed upfront in advertised plan prices |
How Did the Verizon Lawsuit Start?
Plaintiffs first filed suit in the Northern District of California in 2021 concerning the $1.95 monthly “Administrative Charge” on Verizon’s monthly bills, alleging the charge was not actually imposed by government taxes as some of Verizon’s literature suggested but was an arbitrary amount for the sole profit of Verizon.
The path to settlement was not straightforward. Verizon moved to compel arbitration under their Customer Agreement, but the district court found that the agreement was unenforceable under California law because of how it “batches” arbitrations into groups of 25 with delays between each batch.
On November 10, 2023, after settling the federal class actions, plaintiffs’ attorneys filed a new complaint in state court in Middlesex County, New Jersey. That filing became the vehicle for the final $100 million settlement.
Four separate lawsuits were eventually consolidated. The settlement was the culmination of four different lawsuits brought together in a New Jersey court, the same state where Verizon is headquartered.
Key Takeaway: The Verizon lawsuit started in California federal court in 2021, bounced through arbitration challenges, and landed in New Jersey state court before reaching a $100 million settlement in late 2023.
Who Qualifies for the Verizon Settlement?
Current and former Verizon customers who purchased postpaid wireless or data service plans and were charged an “Administrative Charge” and/or an “Administrative and Telco Recovery charge” between Jan. 1, 2016, and Nov. 8, 2023, were eligible for compensation.
To receive a payment, customers also had to file a valid claim by April 15, 2024, and not opt out of the class.
Think of it like a group rebate on a product recall. If you used Verizon on a postpaid plan during those years and paid those fees, you were in the class automatically. But you had to raise your hand and file a claim to get paid.
| Eligibility Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Account Type | Postpaid wireless or data plan |
| Covered Period | January 1, 2016 to November 8, 2023 |
| Fee Type Charged | Administrative Charge and/or Telco Recovery Charge |
| Claim Deadline | April 15, 2024 (now closed) |
| Proof Required | None; Verizon’s billing records verified eligibility |
| Opt-Out Required | Only if you wanted to pursue separate legal action |
Prepaid customers were excluded. The settlement covered only postpaid individual consumer accounts.
How Much Is the Verizon Settlement Payout?
The minimum payout was expected to be around $15, with an additional $1 for each month a customer was charged the fees. Payments were capped at $100 per account.
In theory, a customer billed for the full seven-year period could receive the maximum. In practice, most claimants received far less.
Most people on social media said they got anywhere from $4 to $14 total, deposited to their Venmo or PayPal accounts.
| Months Billed (Formula Example) | Expected Payout | Actual Range Reported |
|---|---|---|
| 12 months | $27 ($15 + $12) | $4 to $14 |
| 24 months | $39 ($15 + $24) | Varies by pro-rata adjustment |
| 84 months (full period) | $99 ($15 + $84) capped at $100 | Below $20 for many |
Some recipients received as little as $2 to $3, much lower than originally anticipated.
Why Were Verizon Settlement Payments So Small?
The short answer: too many claimants, too many fees taken out, not enough money left over.
The settlement agreement specifically described why payments could be less: “In the event the aggregate Settlement Payments across all Valid Claimant accounts exceed the Net Distributable Funds, the Settlement Payment issued to each Valid Claimant account will be reduced on a pro rata basis, as determined by the Settlement Administrator.”
Three things drained the fund before consumers saw a dollar.
- Attorney fees: Attorneys fees and costs totaled $33.3 million, or 33 percent of the $100 million settlement fund.
- Administrative costs: Settlement administration, mailing, and processing costs reduced the available pool further.
- Volume of claims: Millions of valid claimants divided what remained.
Differences in payment amounts were generally attributable to account-specific factors, including partial eligibility periods, account changes, and proportional adjustments when total claims exceeded initial estimates.
Key Takeaway: One-third of the settlement went to lawyers before a single customer received a cent. That reality, combined with millions of claimants, is why so many people opened a Venmo notification for $5 instead of $100.
What Was the Verizon Settlement Claim Deadline?
The claim deadline was April 15, 2024. No extensions were granted. That window is permanently closed.
The deadline to opt out of the class action lawsuit settlement was Feb. 20, 2024, and the objection deadline was Feb. 26, 2024. A final fairness hearing was scheduled for March 22, 2024.
Final approval for this class action settlement was granted April 26, 2024. An appeal was filed May 4, 2024. That appeal delayed everything.
The settlement officially became effective on September 20, 2024, after the final resolution of legal appeals that had previously delayed the process.
| Key Date | Event |
|---|---|
| November 2023 | Settlement proposed; new NJ state complaint filed |
| February 20, 2024 | Opt-out deadline |
| February 26, 2024 | Objection deadline |
| March 22, 2024 | Fairness hearing |
| April 15, 2024 | Claim filing deadline |
| April 26, 2024 | Final court approval granted |
| May 4, 2024 | Appeal filed |
| September 20, 2024 | Settlement effective after appeals resolved |
| January 6, 2025 | Payment distribution began |
How Were Verizon Settlement Payments Distributed?
Payments began in mid-2025 through direct deposit, Zelle transfers, and mailed checks, with amounts ranging from $5 to $100 depending on how long customers paid the disputed charges.
Customers who chose digital payment methods received their funds first. Paper check recipients waited longer due to mail processing.
Customers had the option to choose between direct deposit, Zelle transfer, or a physical check sent by mail. These methods ensured that even customers without digital banking could receive compensation safely.
- Direct deposit: Fastest option; arrived in January 2025 for most
- Zelle and Venmo: Second-fastest; many recipients confirmed payments this way
- Paper checks: Took several additional weeks
- Prepaid Mastercard: Some claimants received a prepaid card instead
The case highlights billing transparency issues in telecommunications. Verizon agreed to clearer billing disclosures going forward.
Key Takeaway: Digital payment methods arrived first in January 2025. Paper check recipients waited weeks longer. The settlement administrator handled all distribution directly, not Verizon.
What Was the Verizon Settlement Payment Formula?
Each legitimate claimant was entitled to $15 per account, plus an additional $1 for each month they received postpaid wireless or data services from Verizon and were charged an administrative fee. Payout amounts were capped at $100 according to the settlement terms.
The formula sounds clean. The reality was messier.
Because the total claims exceeded the available net distributable funds, every payment was reduced proportionally. The 33% attorney fee cut happened first. Then administrative costs. What remained was split among millions of valid claimants.
| Formula Component | Amount |
|---|---|
| Base Payment | $15 per account |
| Monthly Add-On | $1 per month charged |
| Maximum Cap | $100 per account |
| Pro-Rata Reduction Applied | Yes, due to high claim volume |
| Typical Actual Payout Reported | $4 to $14 |
What Happened to Verizon Settlement Attorneys Fees?
This is the part most settlement news coverage quietly skipped. Attorneys fees and costs totaled $33.3 million, or 33 percent of the $100 million settlement fund.
That’s $33.3 million that never reached consumers. In dollar terms, it was the single largest line item in the entire settlement budget.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys settled a nationwide class action in Middlesex County, New Jersey. They previously litigated their claims in the federal courts, but after settling the federal class actions, they filed a new complaint in state court because they knew they could likely get a 33.3% fee award approved with much less judicial oversight. If class attorneys had filed their settlement with their first-filed complaint in the Northern District of California, controlling case law would allow no more than 25% attorneys’ fees, and likely less than that.
So filing in New Jersey state court cost customers an estimated $8.3 million more in attorney fees compared to what a federal court in California would have approved. The Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute represented four intervenors who challenged plaintiffs’ counsel’s forum shopping tactics.
This is a known systemic problem in class action litigation. Consumers win the headline. Attorneys take the check.
Is the Verizon Settlement Closed in 2026?
Yes. As of late 2025, the Verizon settlement for the administrative fee class action is legally closed. The claim-filing period ended in April 2024, and the court has approved no extensions or reopenings of eligibility.
Payment distribution remains the final administrative stage, with all funds tied to previously validated claims. For customers who filed valid claims on time, 2025 represents the payout phase. For those who missed the deadline, the settlement process has concluded, and no additional remedies are available in this case.
If you filed a claim and haven’t received payment by March 2026, the settlement administrator is your contact point. The Settlement Administrator can be reached at Verizon Administrative Charge Settlement, 1650 Arch Street Suite 2210, Philadelphia, PA 19103, or by phone at 844-689-0186.
Key Takeaway: The Verizon class action settlement is fully closed to new claims. Payments continue going out to verified claimants, but no one can join the settlement now.
Can I Still File a Verizon Settlement Claim in 2026?
No. The claim deadline was April 15, 2024. No, you can no longer submit a claim for this Verizon settlement.
There are no court-approved exceptions. No late filing window opened. No new lawsuits on the same issue have been filed that would open another claim period.
What you can do:
- Contact the settlement administrator if you filed before April 2024 and haven’t received payment
- Check whether you qualify for any other open Verizon-related consumer litigation
- Review your current Verizon bill for fees you don’t recognize
Do not respond to unsolicited emails or calls about the settlement. Scammers target settlement recipients. Only use official channels verified through the settlement website to avoid fraud.
What Did the Esposito v. Verizon Case Actually Prove?
The case known as Esposito v. Verizon Wireless is a real legal action filed against Cellco Partnership, which operates under the name Verizon Wireless. The lawsuit centers on claims that Verizon used a deceptive system for charging its customers by adding a monthly Administrative Charge to customer bills without providing a transparent disclosure of the fee beforehand.
The case proved something important: courts will hear class actions over “junk fee” billing even when carriers claim the fees are disclosed somewhere in the fine print.
The plaintiffs specifically alleged that Verizon misrepresented the charge as if it were a mandatory government tax or a required regulatory assessment and that the use of these undisclosed fees led to misleading advertising that did not reflect the true monthly cost of wireless plans.
What the case did not prove: Verizon admitted nothing. The settlement explicitly includes no admission of wrongdoing.
| Legal Issue | Alleged | Verizon’s Position |
|---|---|---|
| Undisclosed fees | Administrative Charge added without upfront notice | Fees were disclosed in contracts and billing |
| Misleading advertising | Plan prices didn’t reflect true monthly cost | Advertised prices were legitimate base rates |
| Fee mischaracterization | Charge implied it was government-mandated | Charge was for regulatory and network costs |
| Consumer harm | Customers paid more than advertised | No wrongdoing; settled to avoid litigation costs |
Did Verizon Change Its Billing Practices After the Settlement?
Yes, partially. As part of this settlement, Verizon agreed to amend its Customer Agreement to include revised Administrative Charge disclosures.
That’s the official answer. The practical reality is more complicated.
The settlement only requires Verizon to revise a few words in its 6,700-word Customer Agreement, and the gist of the words is unchanged.
Critics argue the billing reform was cosmetic. Verizon updated the language around the fee. The fee itself remained, and the company reserved the right to raise it going forward.
Verizon stated that it will continue to charge the Administrative Charge and that it has the right to increase the Administrative Charge.
Key Takeaway: Verizon updated some disclosure language as part of the settlement, but it did not eliminate the charge or cap future increases. The billing reform was limited in real-world impact.
What Is Verizon’s Network Access and Maintenance Fee?
After the settlement, Verizon rebranded the charge that caused the lawsuit. The settlement does not stop Verizon from charging “Network Access and Maintenance Fees,” and in fact Verizon recently increased the fee to $3.30/month.
The “Administrative Charge” that sparked the lawsuit was renamed the “Network Access and Maintenance Fee.” The dollar amount stayed the same or increased. The disclosure language changed slightly.
All class members, meaning all Verizon postpaid customers who did not opt out, “covenant” that they cannot bring claims about the “Administrative Charge” (now called the “Network Access and Maintenance Fee”) ever again. Not in courts or arbitration. The release covers claims “not yet mature, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected,” and has no end date.
That’s worth reading again slowly. By staying in the class and accepting a payment, customers permanently gave up the right to sue over this specific fee type in any forum.
If you currently have a Verizon postpaid plan, check your bill for this line item. It’s still there.
What Does the Verizon Lawsuit Mean for Telecom Consumers?
The Verizon class action lawsuit settlement is one of the largest telecom billing cases in U.S. history. It matters beyond the individual payouts.
So-called “junk fees” are not only derided by consumers but have also attracted the ire of the Biden administration. Last October, the Federal Trade Commission unveiled a proposed rule that would ban businesses from charging hidden or misleading fees and require companies to show full prices upfront.
This settlement highlights the legal scrutiny over undisclosed fees in telecommunications services and aligns with increasing federal attention, including proposed Federal Trade Commission rules, aimed at preventing hidden or misleading charges by service providers.
The takeaway for consumers is practical:
- Read your telecom bill line by line every month
- Understand which charges are taxes vs. carrier-imposed fees
- Know that “administrative” fees are not government-mandated even when they sound like they are
- Class action settlements are often the only leverage consumers have against carriers with billions in revenue
The Verizon settlement paid people a few dollars for years of overcharging. That’s the reality of how class actions work when the harmed class numbers in the tens of millions. The value of the case was in the precedent and the disclosure reform, not the individual check.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much did people actually get from the Verizon settlement?
Most claimants received between $4 and $14, far below the $100 maximum. The settlement agreement set a minimum of $15 per account plus $1 per month, but the amount ultimately depended on claim volume and legal costs. Some recipients received as little as $2 to $3 due to pro-rata reductions after attorney fees and administrative costs were deducted.
Is it too late to file a Verizon settlement claim?
Yes, the claim deadline was April 15, 2024, and no extensions have been granted. The claim-filing period ended in April 2024, and the court has approved no extensions or reopenings of eligibility. If you filed before the deadline and haven’t received payment, contact the settlement administrator directly.
Why were Verizon settlement payments lower than $15?
Payments fell below the stated minimum because of pro-rata reductions. Attorneys fees and costs totaled $33.3 million, or 33 percent of the $100 million settlement fund, reducing the money available for consumers before any payments were issued. The remaining pool was then divided among millions of valid claimants, pushing individual amounts below the $15 floor.
What were the Verizon administrative charges that caused the lawsuit?
Verizon customers charged undisclosed administrative fees ranging from 40 cents a month per line to $3.30 a month per line, which increased over time. The lawsuit alleged these fees were not disclosed in advertised plan prices, making Verizon’s plans appear cheaper than they actually were. Customers on multi-line accounts were charged the fee on each line separately.
Did Verizon admit wrongdoing in the settlement?
No. Verizon has denied and continues to deny that it did anything wrong and that the lawsuit has any merit. Settling a class action does not require a defendant to admit liability; most large companies settle to avoid litigation costs and ongoing uncertainty. The settlement terms included a partial billing disclosure update but no formal acknowledgment of wrongdoing.
What to Do Right Now
The Verizon class action lawsuit settlement is closed. If you filed a valid claim before April 15, 2024, your payment should have arrived by now through Zelle, PayPal, direct deposit, or mail.
If you haven’t received it, call the settlement administrator at 844-689-0186 or write to the administrator in Philadelphia. Don’t call Verizon directly. The settlement administrator controls distributions, not Verizon.
Check your current Verizon bill for the Network Access and Maintenance Fee. It replaced the Administrative Charge after the settlement. It’s still there. And by accepting your settlement payment, you gave up the right to sue over it again.







