The PVC antitrust lawsuit accuses major polyvinyl chloride manufacturers of secretly coordinating to inflate prices, potentially costing buyers hundreds of millions of dollars in overcharges. If your business or household purchased PVC pipes, fittings, or related products during the class period, you may have a right to compensation.
This case has moved significantly into 2026. Courts are actively managing class certification arguments, settlement negotiations, and claim filing processes.
In this article, you’ll learn exactly what happened, who is named as a defendant, whether you qualify, and what the payout picture looks like right now.
One number worth knowing upfront: antitrust price-fixing cases in the construction materials sector have historically produced settlements ranging from $50 million to over $400 million, with individual business claimants recovering thousands depending on purchase volume.
What Is the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit?
The PVC antitrust lawsuit is a federal class action alleging that major PVC pipe and resin manufacturers illegally conspired to fix prices, divide markets, and suppress competition across the United States.
The core accusation is straightforward. Competing companies that should have been undercutting each other on price allegedly coordinated behind closed doors to keep prices artificially high. Buyers paid more than they should have. That gap between the real competitive price and the inflated price is the “overcharge” at the heart of this case.
These lawsuits are filed under federal antitrust law. They are serious. And they affect a wide range of buyers, from individual plumbers to major construction firms.
| Core Case Facts | Details |
|---|---|
| Lawsuit Type | Federal antitrust class action |
| Legal Theory | Price-fixing conspiracy |
| Primary Law Violated | Sherman Antitrust Act Section 1 |
| Products at Issue | PVC pipe, PVC resin, PVC fittings, CPVC pipe |
| Buyer Types Affected | Commercial, industrial, and residential purchasers |
| Current Status | Active litigation and settlement discussions, 2026 |
The lawsuit is not just one case. It involves multiple plaintiffs, multiple defendants, and in many instances, consolidation into a multidistrict litigation docket.
What Is a PVC Price Fixing Lawsuit?
A PVC price fixing lawsuit is a legal action where buyers claim that PVC manufacturers illegally agreed to set prices at artificially high levels instead of competing freely.
Price fixing is a “per se” violation of the Sherman Act. That means plaintiffs don’t need to prove that competition was harmed. Just proving the agreement existed is enough for liability.
Think of it like a restaurant cartel. Imagine every pizza shop in your city quietly agreed to charge a minimum of $25 for a large pizza. Nobody undercuts anyone. Customers pay more with no choice. That’s exactly what the PVC lawsuit alleges happened in the pipe and fittings market.
| What Price Fixing Means | What It Does Not Mean |
|---|---|
| Competitors secretly agree on minimum prices | One company raising prices independently |
| Companies divide markets to avoid competing | A company responding to its own cost increases |
| Bid-rigging on public or private contracts | Industry-wide price trends driven by raw material costs |
| Coordinating output to keep supply artificially low | Companies monitoring public competitor pricing |
The damage to buyers is real. When manufacturers collude, the competitive market no longer functions. Prices stay high. Buyers have no alternative. And the overcharge accumulates for years.
What Is the PVC Pipe Antitrust Class Action?
The PVC pipe antitrust class action is the formal legal vehicle through which thousands of buyers can sue collectively rather than individually.
Class actions exist because individual overcharges, even if real, are often too small to justify a solo lawsuit. A contractor who overpaid $4,000 for pipe over three years can’t realistically sue a billion-dollar manufacturer alone. But thousands of contractors together can.
In a class action, one or more named plaintiffs sue on behalf of everyone in a defined “class.” If the court certifies the class, every qualifying member benefits from the outcome, whether it’s a jury verdict or a settlement.
Class certification is a critical milestone. Courts examine whether the plaintiffs share common legal questions and whether the class mechanism makes sense for resolving them efficiently.
- Class actions allow small claimants to access federal courts
- They create negotiating leverage against large corporate defendants
- Settlement funds are divided among all verified claimants
- You do not need to have filed your own lawsuit to receive compensation
- You must submit a valid claim form during the claims period to receive payment
The PVC pipe class action pulls together buyers from across the supply chain, from resin purchasers at the top to downstream pipe buyers at the retail level.
Which PVC Manufacturers Are Accused of Price Fixing?
Multiple major PVC manufacturers have been named in antitrust actions related to price coordination in the PVC pipe and resin market.
Companies frequently cited in connection with PVC antitrust litigation include:
| Defendant / Company | Role in the Market |
|---|---|
| JM Eagle | One of the largest PVC pipe manufacturers in the U.S. |
| Diamond Plastics | Major producer of PVC pressure pipe |
| North American Pipe Corporation | Significant PVC pipe supplier |
| Charlotte Pipe and Foundry | PVC pipe and fittings manufacturer |
| Westlake Chemical | PVC resin producer and pipe manufacturer |
| Georgia-Pacific | Construction materials and PVC-related products |
| Atkore International | Electrical conduit and PVC products |
It’s important to understand that being named in a lawsuit does not mean a court has found a company guilty. These are allegations. Some companies may settle while others contest the claims. The legal process is ongoing as of 2026.
Some defendants in related historical PVC cases have reached consent agreements with the Department of Justice. Those prior enforcement actions often serve as evidence in civil class action suits that follow.
Key Takeaway: The PVC antitrust lawsuit involves a wide range of major manufacturers, and prior DOJ enforcement activity in this sector has strengthened the civil case for plaintiffs.
Who Are the Named Defendants in the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit?
The named defendants in the PVC antitrust lawsuit are the specific companies identified by plaintiffs as participants in the alleged price-fixing conspiracy.
Not every major PVC maker is necessarily a defendant in every related case. The complaint filed by plaintiffs names specific companies based on evidence gathered during the pre-filing investigation. Additional defendants can be added as discovery reveals new information.
Defendant lists in antitrust class actions tend to expand over time. Cooperating witnesses, internal emails, and pricing data subpoenaed from third parties frequently point to additional participants after the initial filing.
What does this mean for buyers? The broader the defendant list, the larger the potential settlement fund. More defendants mean more corporate defendants sharing liability, which creates stronger pressure toward settlement.
- Defendants can include both domestic manufacturers and foreign companies that sell into the U.S. market
- Parent companies can be held liable for the conduct of subsidiaries
- Trade associations sometimes face scrutiny if they served as a coordination vehicle
If a defendant settles, their settlement payment goes into the fund. Remaining defendants who fight the case to trial face the risk of treble damages, meaning they could owe three times the actual damages proven at trial under federal antitrust law.
How Does the Sherman Act Apply to the PVC Price Fixing Case?
The Sherman Antitrust Act Section 1 is the primary federal law violated in the PVC price fixing case, and it prohibits any contract, combination, or conspiracy that unreasonably restrains trade.
Price fixing among competitors is treated as a per se violation. That is the highest standard of antitrust violation. It means the conduct is presumed illegal without requiring proof of market power or competitive harm.
All plaintiffs need to prove is that an agreement existed. Once that threshold is cleared, the only remaining question is how much damage it caused.
| Sherman Act Concept | What It Means in Plain English |
|---|---|
| Section 1 Violation | Two or more companies agreed to restrain competition |
| Per Se Illegal | Automatically illegal regardless of intent or outcome |
| Treble Damages | Court can award three times the proven overcharge amount |
| Statute of Limitations | Generally four years from when plaintiff discovered the harm |
| Class Period | The time range during which the conspiracy allegedly operated |
The statute of limitations matters a great deal. If you purchased PVC products during the alleged conspiracy period, you may be within the window to file a claim. If your purchases were too old, you may be time-barred.
In antitrust cases, the “discovery rule” can extend the filing window. If plaintiffs couldn’t reasonably have known about the conspiracy until it became public, the clock starts later.
What Is PVC Price Fixing and How Did It Allegedly Work?
PVC price fixing refers to the alleged practice where competing manufacturers secretly agreed to set minimum prices, allocate customers, or coordinate bidding rather than competing on the open market.
The mechanics of a price-fixing cartel in the building materials industry typically follow a recognizable pattern. Executives from competing companies meet, often at trade conferences or industry events. They share pricing information that would otherwise be confidential. They agree informally or explicitly not to undercut each other below a certain floor price.
Over time, buyers see price increases that track suspiciously closely across multiple competing suppliers. Economists analyzing these patterns can identify “coordinated pricing” that doesn’t match what a competitive market would produce.
- Competitors exchange non-public pricing data
- Companies avoid bidding aggressively on each other’s major accounts
- Price announcements are “signaled” publicly so competitors know to follow
- Geographic markets are divided so companies don’t compete in the same regions
- Customers who attempt to switch suppliers find they all quote the same high price
For PVC buyers, this means every dollar spent above the competitive price is a loss they are legally entitled to recover. The lawsuit attempts to put that money back in buyers’ hands.
Key Takeaway: The alleged coordination in the PVC market was not accidental. Plaintiffs argue it followed a deliberate, structured pattern designed to keep prices elevated across the industry.
Who Qualifies for the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit?
Anyone who purchased PVC pipe, PVC resin, or related polyvinyl chloride products directly from a named manufacturer during the class period may qualify for the PVC antitrust lawsuit.
Eligibility depends on three key factors: what you bought, when you bought it, and from whom you bought it.
| Eligibility Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Products Covered | PVC pipe, CPVC pipe, PVC resin, PVC fittings, PVC conduit |
| Class Period | Typically a multi-year window, often 2010 to present (confirm with claims administrator) |
| Who Purchased | Businesses, contractors, distributors, municipalities, individuals |
| Purchase Source | Direct from manufacturer or through distributor (different claim types) |
| Geographic Scope | United States purchasers |
| Documentation Needed | Invoices, purchase orders, receipts, contracts |
Importantly, your purchase doesn’t have to have been enormous. Both small individual purchases and large commercial contracts may qualify. The claims process is designed to scale compensation based on actual purchase volume.
Municipalities, school districts, and government agencies that purchased PVC pipe for infrastructure projects are also potential class members. This is often overlooked.
If you are unsure whether your purchases fall within the class period, the claims administrator’s website (once a settlement is finalized) will include a purchase date lookup tool or eligibility checker.
What Are the Eligibility Requirements for the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit?
The eligibility requirements for the PVC antitrust lawsuit focus on whether you are a member of the certified plaintiff class, which is defined by the court in the class certification order.
To meet the basic threshold, claimants generally need to satisfy these conditions:
- Purchased PVC pipe, resin, or related products during the defined class period
- Did not already receive compensation through a separate settlement or opt out of the class
- Are a U.S.-based purchaser or entity
- Can document purchases through invoices, receipts, or account records
- Have not filed an individual antitrust lawsuit already
Think of eligibility like a ticket to a concert refund. If you bought a ticket in the right window, from the right vendor, you’re entitled to your refund. Missing any one of those conditions takes you out of the eligible pool.
The court’s class definition may distinguish between different categories of buyers. Residential consumers may be treated differently from commercial contractors. Upstream resin buyers may have separate eligibility paths from downstream pipe buyers.
| Buyer Type | Likely Eligibility Status |
|---|---|
| General contractor who bought PVC pipe | Likely eligible |
| Plumbing distributor who resold PVC products | Potentially eligible (indirect purchaser rules apply) |
| Homeowner who bought PVC at hardware store | May qualify under state indirect purchaser statutes |
| Municipality purchasing for infrastructure | Likely eligible |
| Foreign company buying for U.S. projects | Case-by-case basis |
Documentation is the practical gating factor. The stronger your purchase records, the larger your potential claim.
What Is a Direct Purchaser in the PVC Lawsuit?
A direct purchaser in the PVC lawsuit is a buyer who purchased PVC products directly from a manufacturer named as a defendant, with no intermediary involved.
Direct purchasers have the strongest legal standing under federal antitrust law. The Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois established that under federal law, only direct purchasers can sue for antitrust damages. Indirect buyers were originally blocked from recovery in federal court.
This matters enormously. If you bought PVC pipe straight from a manufacturer’s sales team or on a direct account, you are a direct purchaser. Your claim is stronger and your recovery path is cleaner.
| Direct Purchaser | Indirect Purchaser |
|---|---|
| Bought directly from named defendant manufacturer | Bought from a distributor, retailer, or middleman |
| Full recovery available under federal law | Recovery depends on state antitrust laws |
| Typically includes large contractors, distributors | Typically includes smaller contractors, homeowners |
| Stronger legal footing under Illinois Brick doctrine | May still recover under state indirect purchaser statutes |
| Part of the main federal class | May be part of a separate state-law class |
Large plumbing distributors and major construction firms are most commonly direct purchasers. Smaller buyers who went through retailers face the indirect purchaser path.
Key Takeaway: Whether you are a direct or indirect purchaser dramatically affects your legal pathway and recovery options in the PVC antitrust lawsuit.
What Is the Indirect Purchaser PVC Class Action?
The indirect purchaser PVC class action is a separate legal track for buyers who did not purchase PVC products directly from manufacturers but instead bought through distributors, wholesalers, or retailers.
Federal law under Illinois Brick limits direct recovery to those in the first tier of purchase. But Congress and most state legislatures have recognized that this rule can be unfair. As a result, over 30 U.S. states have passed “indirect purchaser statutes” that allow downstream buyers to sue under state antitrust laws.
This creates parallel litigation. Federal courts handle the direct purchaser class. State courts, or sometimes the same federal court applying state law, handle the indirect purchaser class. Both can result in compensation.
- Indirect purchaser cases are filed under state antitrust laws, not federal law
- States with strong indirect purchaser statutes include California, Illinois, New York, Florida, and many others
- Plaintiffs in state classes can recover the portion of the overcharge “passed on” to them through the supply chain
- Damages may be lower per claimant but the class is much larger
For a homeowner who bought PVC pipe at a local hardware store, the indirect purchaser class action may be their only avenue to recovery. That doesn’t make it worthless. Some state-level settlements in similar cases have paid out meaningful amounts to end-of-chain buyers.
Can Commercial Buyers File a PVC Antitrust Lawsuit Claim?
Commercial buyers are among the most eligible and highest-compensated claimants in the PVC antitrust lawsuit.
If your business purchased PVC pipe, CPVC, or PVC resin in bulk for construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, or resale, you likely qualify. Commercial buyers often have better documentation, larger purchase volumes, and therefore larger potential claims than residential buyers.
| Commercial Buyer Type | Typical Purchase Volume | Estimated Claim Potential |
|---|---|---|
| Large general contractor | High (multi-year projects) | Thousands to tens of thousands |
| Plumbing subcontractor | Medium to high | Hundreds to thousands |
| Municipal water authority | Very high | Significant; may warrant individual claim |
| Hardware distributor or wholesaler | High | High; may have direct purchaser status |
| Small plumbing shop | Low to medium | Hundreds |
Commercial buyers who maintained invoices and purchase records are in the best position. Even if you no longer have paper invoices, business accounting records, bank statements, or project cost records can substitute.
Government entities, including city water departments and state transportation agencies, have successfully recovered in prior construction materials antitrust cases. Their purchase volumes are often so large that individual negotiated settlements outside the class become worthwhile.
The commercial buyer distinction also matters for the treble damages question. Courts award three times actual damages in antitrust cases. For a business that spent millions on PVC over a decade, even a modest overcharge percentage translates into a very large claim.
How Much Is the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit Payout?
The PVC antitrust lawsuit payout depends on the total settlement fund amount, the number of valid claims, and how much each claimant spent on PVC products during the class period.
No final settlement has been publicly announced as of early 2026. But historical benchmarks from comparable antitrust price-fixing cases in construction materials give a useful reference frame.
| Comparable Case | Settlement Amount | Approximate Individual Recovery |
|---|---|---|
| Drywall antitrust price-fixing litigation | $190 million+ across settlements | Varied by purchase volume |
| Marine hose antitrust conspiracy | $50 million+ in U.S. criminal fines alone | Large commercial buyers: significant |
| Polyurethane foam antitrust case | $427 million settlement | Consumers: $50 to $250; businesses: more |
| Liquid aluminum sulfate antitrust | $95 million settlement | Municipalities: highest recoveries |
For individual residential claimants with limited purchase documentation, payouts in similar cases have ranged from $25 to $250.
For commercial claimants with documented high-volume purchases, recoveries have reached $10,000 to $500,000 or more depending on purchase history.
The overcharge percentage in antitrust cases typically ranges from 5% to 25% of the purchase price, based on economic expert calculations.
The single biggest factor in your payout is documentation. More purchase records mean a higher verified claim amount and a larger slice of the settlement fund.
What Is the PVC Class Action Settlement Amount?
The PVC class action settlement amount refers to the total dollar figure agreed upon between the defendant companies and the plaintiff class, which is then distributed to eligible claimants.
As of 2026, the case has not reached a globally announced settlement. However, partial settlements with individual defendants are possible and are common in multi-defendant antitrust MDLs. One defendant may settle early to cooperate, while others continue to fight.
When a settlement is reached, the process works like this:
- Step 1: Settlement amount is negotiated and submitted to the court for approval
- Step 2: Court holds a fairness hearing where class members can object
- Step 3: Court approves the settlement and issues a claims notice
- Step 4: Claimants submit claims forms with documentation
- Step 5: Claims administrator reviews and verifies claims
- Step 6: Payments are distributed after the appeals window closes
Attorney fees typically consume 25% to 33% of the total settlement fund in class actions. Administration costs take another small percentage. The remaining amount is the “net settlement fund” distributed to claimants.
Claimants are paid on a pro-rata basis relative to their verified purchase amounts, adjusted by the overcharge formula developed by plaintiffs’ economic experts.
Key Takeaway: There is no final global settlement in the PVC antitrust case as of 2026, but partial settlements and the overall litigation timeline suggest resolution may be approaching within the next one to two years.
What Is the PVC Settlement 2026 Status?
The PVC settlement 2026 status is that the case remains in active litigation, with class certification proceedings, discovery, and potentially early defendant settlements occurring throughout the year.
Here is the current 2026 snapshot based on where similar antitrust cases stand at comparable procedural stages:
| Litigation Phase | 2026 Status |
|---|---|
| Class Certification | Likely briefed or argued in 2025/2026 |
| Discovery (document review) | Ongoing; large document productions expected |
| Expert witness reports | Likely filed or being prepared |
| Mediation/settlement talks | Probable; parties often engage mediators during this phase |
| Trial date | Not yet set; MDL cases rarely go to trial |
| Claim filing deadline | Not yet announced; set after settlement approval |
MDL antitrust cases of this scale typically take four to eight years from initial filing to final distribution. The PVC case, depending on when complaints were first filed, may be approaching the midpoint or later stage of that timeline.
Buyers who want to stay current should monitor the case docket through the federal PACER system or check the claims administrator’s website once one is established.
Opting out of the class is an option for large claimants who believe they can recover more through individual litigation. This decision has a hard deadline set by the court. Missing it means you are bound by the class settlement terms.
How Do You File a PVC Antitrust Claim?
Filing a PVC antitrust claim requires submitting a completed claim form through the official settlement claims website once the court approves a settlement and opens the claims period.
You cannot file a claim right now if the settlement has not yet been announced. But you can prepare everything you need so you’re ready the moment the window opens.
Steps to file a PVC antitrust claim:
- Gather your documentation. Collect all invoices, purchase orders, receipts, contracts, and accounting records showing PVC product purchases during the class period.
- Identify your purchase dates. Match your purchases to the class period dates defined in the settlement agreement.
- Calculate your approximate purchase volume. The claims form will ask for dollar amounts or linear footage of pipe purchased by year.
- Complete the claim form accurately. Errors or inconsistencies can result in reduced or denied claims.
- Submit before the deadline. Late claims are rejected. Courts do not grant individual extensions.
- Keep copies of everything. You may receive a follow-up request for additional documentation.
| Preparation Task | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Locate purchase invoices | Primary proof of purchase volume |
| Review accounting software records | Supplemental documentation if invoices are lost |
| Contact your PVC supplier | They may have purchase history on file for you |
| Check your class membership | Confirm you did not already opt out or settle separately |
| Monitor case docket | Know exactly when the claims window opens |
If you are a large commercial buyer, consider engaging a law firm that specializes in antitrust claims. They can maximize your claim amount and handle appeals if your claim is disputed.
What Is the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit Timeline?
The PVC antitrust lawsuit timeline spans from the initial complaint filing through class certification, discovery, settlement negotiations, court approval, claims submission, and final payment distribution.
Understanding this timeline helps you know where the case stands and what comes next.
| Phase | Typical Timing in MDL Antitrust Case |
|---|---|
| Complaint filed | Year 1 |
| MDL consolidation (if multiple cases) | Year 1 to Year 2 |
| Class certification briefing | Year 2 to Year 3 |
| Discovery (document and deposition) | Year 2 to Year 4 |
| Expert witness reports | Year 3 to Year 4 |
| Settlement negotiations | Year 3 to Year 5 |
| Court approval of settlement | Year 4 to Year 6 |
| Claims period open | Year 5 to Year 7 |
| Payment distribution | Year 6 to Year 8 |
For the PVC antitrust lawsuit, the specific years depend on when the earliest complaint was filed. If initial complaints were filed in 2020 or 2021, the case may be approaching the settlement negotiation phase in 2026.
One thing to understand: the claims window is typically only 60 to 150 days after the settlement is approved. Miss it and you get nothing, even if you fully qualify.
Set calendar reminders. Subscribe to court notifications on PACER if you are a large commercial buyer. Check industry trade publications, as they often report on major construction materials antitrust settlements before general media does.
What Is the PVC Antitrust Lawsuit 2026 Status?
The PVC antitrust lawsuit 2026 status is active and progressing, with key procedural milestones either completed or expected during the year.
Based on the known trajectory of similar antitrust class actions in the construction materials space, 2026 represents a pivotal year. Cases at this stage are typically in late discovery, moving toward expert depositions, and beginning serious settlement mediation.
2026 Key Developments to Watch:
- Class certification ruling from the presiding court
- Appointment of lead plaintiffs’ counsel if not already completed
- Filing of plaintiffs’ economic expert reports quantifying the overcharge
- Defendant motions to dismiss or for summary judgment
- Mediation sessions with a court-appointed or agreed mediator
- Potential partial settlement announcements with cooperating defendants
Significant antitrust actions by the Department of Justice in the construction materials space in recent years have created a favorable environment for private plaintiffs. Government enforcement actions often precede and strengthen civil class action recoveries.
Buyers who purchased PVC products and have not yet heard about this lawsuit should understand that they do not lose their potential claim by not acting now. As long as you are within the class period and did not opt out, you remain a class member. Your action is to prepare documentation and watch for the claims filing window.
Key Takeaway: The PVC antitrust lawsuit in 2026 is at a critical stage where key procedural decisions will shape the settlement timeline, making this the right time to gather documentation and verify your eligibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the PVC antitrust lawsuit about?
The PVC antitrust lawsuit alleges that major polyvinyl chloride pipe and resin manufacturers illegally conspired to fix prices and eliminate competition.
The result was that buyers across the supply chain paid inflated prices for PVC products for years.
The lawsuit seeks to recover those overcharges through a class action settlement or trial verdict.
Who qualifies for the PVC antitrust lawsuit?
Anyone who purchased PVC pipe, PVC resin, CPVC pipe, or related polyvinyl chloride products directly or indirectly from named defendant manufacturers during the class period may qualify.
Eligible buyers include contractors, plumbing companies, distributors, municipalities, and in some cases, residential consumers.
Documentation of your purchases is required to file a valid claim.
How much money can I get from the PVC price fixing settlement?
The exact amount has not been set because no final global settlement has been announced as of 2026.
In comparable antitrust cases, residential buyers received between $25 and $250, while commercial buyers with large documented purchases recovered thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Your recovery is directly tied to your verified purchase volume during the class period.
What is the deadline to file a PVC antitrust claim in 2026?
There is no current filing deadline because the claims period has not opened as of early 2026.
The deadline will be set by the court when it approves a settlement, and it typically runs for 60 to 150 days from the approval date.
Monitor the case docket or the official claims administrator’s website for the announcement.
What is the difference between a direct and indirect purchaser in the PVC lawsuit?
A direct purchaser bought PVC products directly from a named manufacturer defendant.
An indirect purchaser bought through a distributor, retailer, or middleman and must rely on state antitrust laws rather than federal law for recovery.
Direct purchasers generally have stronger legal standing and potentially larger claims, while indirect purchasers may have separate state-law class actions available to them.
Stay Ready. Stay Informed. Your Claim Has Real Value.
The PVC antitrust lawsuit represents a real financial opportunity for anyone who bought PVC pipe or related products during the conspiracy period. The case is moving. The documentation window is now.
Pull your old invoices. Check your accounting records. If you run a business that uses PVC, talk to your purchasing team and gather everything you have.
The claims period will open after court settlement approval. When it does, only buyers who are prepared with documentation will file strong claims. Do not wait until the deadline to start looking for your records.
