The Lindt class action lawsuit over lead and cadmium contamination in dark chocolate is still moving through the courts in 2026, and consumers who purchased Lindt dark chocolate products may be entitled to compensation. This lawsuit affects millions of people who bought Lindt dark chocolate bars without knowing they might contain heavy metals at levels above recommended safety thresholds.
The case traces back to a major Consumer Reports investigation that sent shockwaves through the chocolate industry. What followed was a wave of class action filings targeting some of the most trusted chocolate brands in the world.
In this guide, you’ll learn exactly what the lawsuit claims, which products are named, how much lead and cadmium was actually found, and what steps you can take right now if you’re a regular dark chocolate buyer.
What Is the Lindt Class Action Lawsuit About Lead and Cadmium?
The Lindt class action lawsuit alleges that Lindt and Sprungli knowingly sold dark chocolate products containing unsafe levels of lead and cadmium without warning consumers. Plaintiffs argue that Lindt misrepresented its products as safe, premium food items while heavy metal testing revealed contamination above widely recognized safety benchmarks.
Lead and cadmium are toxic heavy metals. Even small amounts consumed regularly over time can cause serious health problems in adults and children.
The lawsuits are built on product liability and consumer protection legal theories. Plaintiffs argue that Lindt had a duty to test its products, disclose contamination risks, and either reformulate or label the products with appropriate warnings.
Quick Facts:
| Element | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Lead | Neurotoxin; no safe level established for children |
| Cadmium | Kidney toxin; accumulates in body over years |
| Legal Theory | Product liability, consumer fraud, failure to warn |
| Filing Jurisdiction | U.S. federal and state courts |
| Class | All U.S. consumers who purchased named Lindt products |
The lawsuits do not allege that one chocolate bar will kill you. They argue that regular consumption of a product marketed as healthy and premium, without disclosure of heavy metal content, is a deceptive and dangerous practice.
What Is the Status of the Lindt Dark Chocolate Lawsuit in 2026?
As of 2026, the Lindt dark chocolate lawsuit is in active litigation in U.S. federal court. The cases have progressed past initial pleadings, with courts denying some early motions to dismiss filed by Lindt’s defense team.
That denial is significant. It means a judge found the plaintiffs’ legal arguments credible enough to proceed to the discovery phase.
Discovery in class action cases like this is where both sides exchange evidence, internal company documents, product testing records, and communications. This phase often reveals whether a company knew about contamination and chose not to act.
Current Case Status at a Glance:
| Phase | Status (2026) |
|---|---|
| Initial Filing | Complete (2022-2023) |
| Motion to Dismiss | Denied (partially) |
| Discovery | Active |
| Class Certification | Pending |
| Settlement Talks | Ongoing/Unconfirmed |
| Trial Date | Not Yet Set |
No final settlement has been announced as of the publication of this article. The case is still working through procedural steps before any payout fund would be established.
Lindt Lawsuit Update 2026: What Has Changed Recently?
The biggest development in the Lindt lawsuit in 2026 is the push toward class certification. This is the step where a judge officially decides whether the case can proceed as a class action on behalf of all affected consumers, rather than just the individual named plaintiffs.
Class certification is often the make-or-break moment in cases like this.
If the court certifies the class, Lindt faces far greater legal and financial exposure. That pressure often drives companies toward settlement negotiations. If certification is denied, individual consumers would need to sue on their own, which almost no one does.
Key 2026 Developments:
- Plaintiffs’ legal teams have filed briefs supporting class certification
- Lindt’s defense has challenged the scientific methodology used to establish harm
- Additional plaintiffs from multiple states have joined the consolidated action
- Regulatory scrutiny from consumer protection agencies has increased
- Consumer Reports and independent labs have conducted follow-up testing in 2024 and 2025
The scientific battle over testing methodology is central. Lindt’s defense argues that the testing methods used by plaintiffs’ experts overstate contamination levels. Plaintiffs counter that their methods meet or exceed FDA standards for food safety analysis.
Key Takeaway: The Lindt lawsuit is deeper into litigation in 2026 than most people realize, with class certification now the central legal battleground that could determine whether consumers get paid.
The Consumer Reports Dark Chocolate Lead Study That Started It All
The Consumer Reports investigation published in December 2022 was the catalyst for every Lindt-related heavy metal lawsuit that followed. The study tested 28 dark chocolate products from major brands and found that nearly all of them contained detectable levels of lead and cadmium.
Lindt was among the brands flagged. That finding gave plaintiffs’ attorneys the scientific foundation they needed to file suit.
The study used California’s Prop 65 safety standards as a benchmark. Under Prop 65, companies must warn consumers if their products expose people to more than 0.5 micrograms of lead per day or 4.1 micrograms of cadmium per day. Several Lindt products exceeded those thresholds based on Consumer Reports’ testing.
Consumer Reports Key Findings:
| Finding | Detail |
|---|---|
| Products Tested | 28 dark chocolate bars across major brands |
| Brands Flagged | Lindt, Hershey’s, Theo, Trader Joe’s, and others |
| Cadmium Concern | 16 of 28 products exceeded Prop 65 cadmium limit |
| Lead Concern | 23 of 28 products exceeded Prop 65 lead limit |
| Lindt Products | Flagged for both lead AND cadmium in multiple varieties |
Consumer Reports did not say that eating one chocolate bar would harm you. What the study showed was that regular consumption of these products, say a few squares per day, could push a person over the recommended maximum daily exposure for these metals.
How Much Lead Is Actually in Lindt Chocolate?
The specific lead levels found in Lindt dark chocolate varied by product, but Consumer Reports’ testing found some Lindt Excellence bars exceeding the Prop 65 maximum allowable daily dose for lead by a factor of two or more when consumed in typical serving amounts.
To put that in perspective, the FDA has stated there is no safe level of lead exposure. Any amount carries some risk.
The lead does not come from Lindt’s factories. It originates in the cocoa beans themselves. Cocoa trees absorb lead from soil, and soil contamination is a documented problem in West African cocoa-growing regions, which supply a large percentage of the world’s cocoa.
Estimated Lead Levels in Named Lindt Products:
| Product | Approx. Lead per Serving | Prop 65 Daily Max |
|---|---|---|
| Lindt Excellence 70% Cocoa | Above 0.5 mcg (reported) | 0.5 mcg/day |
| Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa | Above 0.5 mcg (reported) | 0.5 mcg/day |
| Lindt Classic Recipe Dark | Near or above threshold | 0.5 mcg/day |
The lawsuit does not require you to prove you were visibly harmed. It argues that selling a product with undisclosed heavy metal content at those levels is itself the harm, because consumers paid a premium price for chocolate they believed was safe.
Lindt Cadmium Levels: What the Testing Revealed
Lindt’s cadmium levels were also flagged in the Consumer Reports study, with certain products testing above California’s Prop 65 daily maximum for cadmium based on typical portion sizes. Cadmium is particularly concerning because it builds up in your kidneys over years and is nearly impossible to excrete once absorbed.
Unlike lead, which distributes throughout the body, cadmium targets the kidneys with unusual precision.
The source of cadmium in dark chocolate is similar to lead. Cocoa beans absorb cadmium from soil. Regions in Central and South America also contribute to cadmium-heavy cocoa crops. The higher the cocoa percentage, the more cadmium in the finished product.
Cadmium Levels Breakdown:
| Cadmium Factor | Detail |
|---|---|
| Prop 65 Daily Limit | 4.1 micrograms per day |
| Accumulation | Stays in kidneys 10 to 30 years |
| Main Source | Cocoa bean absorption from soil |
| Risk Factor | Higher cocoa percentage = more cadmium |
| Population at Risk | Regular dark chocolate consumers, especially pregnant women |
The lawsuit argues Lindt was aware or should have been aware of cadmium content through standard quality testing. The plaintiffs claim the company chose to prioritize sales over consumer disclosure.
Key Takeaway: Both lead and cadmium were found in Lindt products above Prop 65 safety thresholds, and the lawsuit centers on the company’s failure to disclose this to consumers who paid premium prices assuming product safety.
How Do Lindt Chocolate Lead Levels Compare to FDA Limits?
The FDA does not currently have a specific limit for lead or cadmium in dark chocolate, which is actually part of what makes this lawsuit complicated. Plaintiffs rely heavily on California’s Prop 65 standards and the FDA’s broader food safety guidance, which states that the goal is to minimize heavy metal exposure from food as much as possible.
The FDA’s “action level” framework means that when heavy metals in food are found at concerning levels, regulatory attention follows. But the absence of a hard federal limit for chocolate specifically gives companies some legal cover.
That said, the FDA has taken steps since 2022 to tighten guidance on heavy metals in food, particularly for products consumed by children and pregnant women.
Lead Limits: Regulatory Comparison:
| Agency/Standard | Lead Limit | Applies To Chocolate? |
|---|---|---|
| FDA (Bottled Water) | 0 ppb (goal) | No |
| FDA (Candy for Children) | 0.1 ppm | Partially |
| California Prop 65 | 0.5 mcg/day exposure | Yes, used in lawsuit |
| WHO | Minimize as low as possible | Yes, general guidance |
| EU Limit (Cocoa) | 0.10 mg/kg | Not U.S. law |
The plaintiffs argue that Lindt sells products marketed for health-conscious adults and uses language suggesting premium quality. That positioning, they say, creates a reasonable consumer expectation of safety that Lindt failed to meet.
Which Other Dark Chocolate Brands Face Lead and Cadmium Lawsuits?
Lindt is not the only brand facing legal action over heavy metals in dark chocolate. The Consumer Reports study triggered lawsuits against multiple companies, making this one of the larger food safety litigation waves of the past several years.
Think of it like the PFAS lawsuits, but for the candy aisle.
Several major brands received similar legal challenges after the 2022 study. Some have settled portions of their litigation quietly, while others are still in early stages.
Other Brands Facing Similar Lawsuits:
| Brand | Legal Status (Approx.) |
|---|---|
| Hershey’s | Class action filed; litigation ongoing |
| Trader Joe’s | Class action filed; motions stage |
| Theo Chocolate | Named in complaints; status varies |
| Whole Foods 365 | Named in study; legal status varies |
| Green & Black’s | Flagged in testing; legal filings reported |
Each lawsuit is technically separate. A settlement in the Hershey’s case would not automatically result in a Lindt settlement, and vice versa. But mass litigation against an entire industry often creates pressure for an industry-wide resolution.
What Are the Health Risks of Cadmium in Chocolate?
Cadmium in chocolate poses a real health risk when consumed regularly over long periods. It is not about one piece of chocolate causing immediate symptoms. The danger is accumulation. Your body stores cadmium in the kidneys and liver, and it stays there for decades.
Most people don’t feel anything for years. That’s what makes it so dangerous.
The kidneys bear the heaviest burden. Chronic cadmium exposure causes tubular dysfunction, meaning the kidneys slowly lose their ability to filter waste from your blood properly. In extreme cases, this progresses to kidney disease.
Cadmium Health Risks by Exposure Level:
| Exposure Level | Potential Health Effect |
|---|---|
| Short-term, low dose | Usually no symptoms |
| Long-term, low dose | Kidney tubular damage, bone loss |
| Elevated chronic dose | Chronic kidney disease, increased cancer risk |
| Pregnancy exposure | Risk to fetal development, low birth weight |
| Children | Higher absorption rate, developmental concerns |
The WHO classifies cadmium as a Group 1 carcinogen, meaning there is sufficient evidence it causes cancer in humans. That classification applies to occupational exposure levels, but it establishes cadmium’s toxicity profile as serious.
Key Takeaway: The health risks of cadmium are real but slow-moving, which is exactly why regular consumers of dark chocolate deserve to know what’s in the product they’re eating year after year.
Long-Term Health Effects of Cadmium Exposure from Food
Long-term cadmium exposure from food sources, including chocolate, is linked to kidney damage, bone demineralization, and increased cancer risk over decades. The body’s cadmium burden grows with every exposure because humans excrete very little of it once absorbed.
The biological half-life of cadmium in the human kidney is estimated between 10 and 30 years. That means cadmium you absorb today is still affecting your kidneys three decades from now.
Bone demineralization is a secondary effect. When cadmium damages kidney function, the kidneys lose the ability to regulate calcium and phosphorus properly. Bones gradually weaken as a result. This effect is documented in populations with long-term dietary cadmium exposure, including in agricultural communities near contaminated soil.
Long-Term Cadmium Exposure Effects:
- Kidney tubular dysfunction (earliest detectable sign)
- Proteinuria (protein in urine, a sign of kidney stress)
- Reduced bone mineral density
- Increased risk of lung cancer (especially in heavy smokers with cadmium exposure)
- Potential cardiovascular effects at elevated exposure levels
- Developmental effects in children and fetuses
The lawsuits argue that Lindt’s failure to disclose cadmium content deprived consumers of the ability to make informed choices about long-term risk, especially for people eating dark chocolate daily for health benefits.
Is Lindt Chocolate Still Safe to Eat in 2026?
Lindt has not issued a product recall, and no federal agency has ordered Lindt to pull products from shelves. That means Lindt dark chocolate is still legally on the market in 2026. Whether it is “safe” depends on how you define the word and how much you eat.
Eating one Lindt dark chocolate bar per year carries negligible risk from heavy metals. Eating several squares every day for years is a different calculation.
The FDA’s guidance on heavy metals in food centers on the concept of minimizing exposure, especially for vulnerable groups like pregnant women, children, and people with pre-existing kidney disease. If you fall into those categories, the scientific and medical consensus suggests reducing or eliminating regular dark chocolate consumption until cleaner sourcing standards are established.
Who Should Be Most Cautious:
| Group | Reason for Elevated Concern |
|---|---|
| Pregnant women | Cadmium and lead cross the placenta |
| Children under 12 | Higher absorption rate per body weight |
| People with kidney disease | Cadmium worsens existing kidney impairment |
| Daily dark chocolate consumers | Cumulative dose exceeds safety thresholds faster |
| People with high dietary cadmium from other sources | Total cadmium load matters |
Lindt has stated that its products comply with applicable food safety regulations. The lawsuit disputes whether regulatory compliance is sufficient when Prop 65 standards are exceeded.
Who Qualifies for the Lindt Lawsuit?
You may qualify for the Lindt class action lawsuit if you purchased Lindt dark chocolate products in the United States within the applicable statute of limitations period, typically within the past four to six years depending on your state. You do not need to have been diagnosed with a medical condition to qualify.
That’s one of the most misunderstood parts of this lawsuit.
Consumer fraud class actions allow people to seek compensation for being deceived about a product, not just for being physically harmed. The legal argument is that you paid for something that was worth less than what was represented to you.
General Eligibility Criteria:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Purchase Location | United States |
| Purchase Period | Approximately 2018 to present (varies by state) |
| Product Type | Named Lindt dark chocolate products |
| Proof of Purchase | Helpful but not always required |
| Medical Diagnosis Required | No, not for consumer fraud claims |
| State Residency | Varies; some state-specific claims have additional requirements |
People in California may have stronger claims due to Prop 65, which requires specific warnings about lead and cadmium exposure. If you regularly purchased Lindt dark chocolate in California and received no such warning, your legal position may be particularly strong.
Key Takeaway: You do not need a doctor’s note or an injury diagnosis to potentially qualify for this lawsuit. Purchasing the named products during the covered period may be enough to establish your place in the class.
What Products Are Included in the Lindt Lawsuit?
The Lindt products most prominently named in the class action lawsuits are the Excellence line of dark chocolate bars, particularly those with 70% cocoa content or higher. Higher cocoa percentages correlate with higher heavy metal concentrations because the heavy metals come from the cocoa itself.
The general rule: darker chocolate carries more risk for heavy metal content.
Other products in Lindt’s lineup may also be included depending on the specific complaint filed in each jurisdiction. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have cast a broad net to include any Lindt dark chocolate product tested and found to exceed Prop 65 thresholds.
Lindt Products Named in Litigation:
| Product | Cocoa % | Included in Lawsuit |
|---|---|---|
| Lindt Excellence 70% Cocoa Bar | 70% | Yes |
| Lindt Excellence 85% Cocoa Bar | 85% | Yes |
| Lindt Excellence 90% Cocoa Bar | 90% | Yes |
| Lindt Excellence 99% Cocoa Bar | 99% | Yes |
| Lindt Classic Recipe Dark Chocolate | Varies | Named in some complaints |
| Lindt Lindor Dark Chocolate Truffles | Lower % | Less prominently named |
Milk chocolate products are generally not included because milk chocolate contains far less cocoa solids, meaning the heavy metal concentrations are substantially lower.
What Is the Lindt Settlement 2026 Status?
As of 2026, no formal class action settlement has been publicly announced or approved by a court in the Lindt lead and cadmium lawsuits. The case is in active litigation, and settlement discussions, if they are happening, are not public at this stage.
This does not mean a settlement won’t happen. It means it hasn’t happened yet.
Class action settlements in food safety cases typically occur after class certification is either granted or appears likely. Companies often prefer to settle rather than face a certified class of millions of consumers. The Lindt case is approaching that pressure point.
Settlement Timeline Possibilities:
| Scenario | Likely Outcome |
|---|---|
| Class Certified (2026) | Strong pressure for settlement |
| Class Denied (2026) | Litigation continues individually |
| Settlement Announced (2026-2027) | Claims process begins |
| Trial Proceeds (2027-2028) | Court decides without settlement |
Watch for news about class certification rulings. That decision will be the clearest signal of where this case is heading. Once a class is certified, the economics of continued litigation often push companies toward negotiation.
How Much Could You Get? Lindt Lawsuit Payout Amounts
No confirmed settlement fund or per-claimant payout amount exists for the Lindt lawsuit as of 2026 because no settlement has been finalized. Based on comparable food safety class actions, individual payouts in consumer fraud cases typically range from small cash amounts to partial product refunds, with higher awards possible for documented health harm.
Don’t expect a life-changing check. Class action consumer fraud cases tend to prioritize accountability over large individual awards.
In similar food safety and mislabeling class actions that have settled, individual claimants without documented medical injury typically received between $10 and $200, depending on how many purchases they could document and the total size of the settlement fund.
Payout Range Estimates Based on Similar Cases:
| Claim Type | Estimated Range |
|---|---|
| No proof of purchase, standard claim | $10 to $30 |
| With proof of purchase (receipts) | $30 to $100 |
| Multiple purchases documented | $75 to $200 |
| Documented health harm (medical records) | Higher, case-specific |
| Attorney fees (taken from fund) | Typically 25 to 33% of total fund |
These figures are estimates based on comparable litigation. The actual Lindt settlement amount, if and when one is reached, could be higher or lower depending on the total class size and negotiated fund.
Key Takeaway: Realistic expectations matter here. Most class members in consumer fraud cases get modest cash payments, but the real value often comes from forcing companies to change their products, labeling, and sourcing practices.
How to File a Lindt Chocolate Claim
To file a claim in the Lindt class action lawsuit, you need to register with the settlement administrator if and when a settlement is approved and a claims process is opened. Right now in 2026, no formal claims portal is open because no settlement has been finalized.
That said, you can and should take steps now to prepare.
Start by gathering any proof that you purchased Lindt dark chocolate products. This includes credit card statements, bank records, grocery store loyalty account purchase histories, and physical receipts. Even if proof is not strictly required, having it usually results in a higher payout tier.
Steps to Prepare Your Claim Now:
- Identify which Lindt products you purchased from the named list
- Gather receipts, credit card statements, or loyalty program records showing purchases
- Estimate the time period and frequency of your purchases
- Sign up for class action alert services that will notify you when the claims portal opens
- Do not throw away any Lindt packaging or receipts you currently have
Filing Process Once Settlement Opens:
| Step | What to Do |
|---|---|
| 1. Claim Notification | Look for official settlement notice (mail or online) |
| 2. Visit Claims Portal | Go to the official settlement website |
| 3. Fill Out Claim Form | Provide purchase details, contact info |
| 4. Submit Documentation | Upload receipts or loyalty account records |
| 5. Wait for Processing | Settlement administrator reviews claims |
| 6. Receive Payment | Check, PayPal, or Venmo depending on settlement terms |
The most common mistake people make in class action claims is waiting too long. Once a deadline passes, there is no extension. Mark your calendar the moment a deadline is announced.
What Is the Lindt Lawsuit Filing Deadline?
There is no confirmed claim filing deadline for the Lindt lawsuit as of 2026 because the settlement process has not begun. Deadlines will be set by the court once a settlement is approved. Typically, class members have 60 to 120 days from the date of official notice to file their claims.
Missing that window means forfeiting your compensation entirely.
The statute of limitations for the underlying legal claims varies by state, generally running two to six years from the date of purchase or the date you discovered (or should have discovered) the harm. The December 2022 Consumer Reports study is often cited as the discovery trigger point.
Deadline Considerations:
| Factor | Timeframe |
|---|---|
| Statute of Limitations (Consumer Fraud) | 2 to 6 years (varies by state) |
| Claim Filing Deadline After Settlement | Usually 60 to 120 days post-notice |
| Discovery Trigger | December 2022 (Consumer Reports study) |
| Earliest Covered Purchases | Typically 4 to 6 years before filing date |
| Check Back Dates | Monitor court dockets through 2026-2027 |
Set up Google alerts for “Lindt settlement 2026” and “Lindt class action claims deadline” to catch the announcement the moment it’s made public.
Are You Eligible? Lindt Lawsuit Eligible Purchases Explained
Your purchase of Lindt dark chocolate qualifies for inclusion in the lawsuit if it falls within the covered product list and the applicable time window. Most complaints cover purchases made from around 2018 through the present date of filing, though the exact window depends on the specific complaint and state law.
You do not need to have purchased a specific quantity. Even occasional buyers may qualify.
The key factors are: you bought a named Lindt dark chocolate product, you bought it in the United States, and you bought it during the covered period. Class members do not need to prove they consumed the entire bar or experienced any symptom.
Eligible Purchase Checklist:
| Eligibility Factor | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Product Type | Lindt dark chocolate (Excellence line primarily) |
| Purchase Country | United States only |
| Purchase Date | Approximately 2018 to 2024 (varies) |
| Minimum Quantity | No minimum established in most complaints |
| Medical Injury Required | No (for consumer fraud claims) |
| Proof of Purchase | Helpful but not universally required |
| State of Purchase | All U.S. states (some states have stronger claims) |
If you bought Lindt dark chocolate regularly as part of a health routine, which is common since dark chocolate is widely marketed for antioxidant benefits, you have a strong factual basis for inclusion in the class.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Lindt class action lawsuit about lead and cadmium?
The Lindt class action lawsuit alleges that Lindt dark chocolate products contain unsafe levels of lead and cadmium that were never disclosed to consumers.
Plaintiffs argue this constitutes consumer fraud and product liability because buyers paid premium prices for a product they believed was safe.
The lawsuits were triggered by a December 2022 Consumer Reports study that tested 28 dark chocolate brands and found many exceeded California Prop 65 safety thresholds for heavy metals.
How much money could I get from the Lindt chocolate lawsuit in 2026?
No settlement has been finalized in 2026, so no exact payout amount exists yet.
Based on comparable food safety class action settlements, individual consumers without documented medical harm typically receive between $10 and $200, depending on purchase history.
Consumers with documented health effects linked to heavy metal exposure may be eligible for larger, case-specific compensation.
Which Lindt chocolate products are included in the lawsuit?
The primary products named in the Lindt lawsuit are the Excellence dark chocolate bars with 70%, 85%, 90%, and 99% cocoa content.
These products were specifically flagged in Consumer Reports’ testing for exceeding Prop 65 limits for both lead and cadmium.
Milk chocolate and lower-cocoa products are generally not included because heavy metal concentrations increase with cocoa percentage.
What are the health risks of eating chocolate with lead and cadmium?
Lead is a neurotoxin with no established safe level of exposure, particularly for children and pregnant women.
Cadmium accumulates in the kidneys over decades and is linked to kidney disease, bone weakening, and increased cancer risk with long-term exposure.
The risk from occasional consumption is low, but regular daily consumption of high-cocoa chocolate pushes exposure levels closer to or above recognized safety thresholds.
How do I file a claim in the Lindt class action lawsuit?
Right now in 2026, no claims portal is open because no settlement has been finalized.
When a settlement is approved, a court-appointed administrator will open a claims process and notify class members through mail, email, or published legal notices.
To prepare, gather any receipts or purchase records for Lindt dark chocolate products bought in the past several years and monitor official court announcements for filing deadlines.
The Bottom Line on the Lindt Lead and Cadmium Lawsuit
The Lindt class action lawsuit over lead and cadmium is one of the most significant food safety legal battles of the past few years. Millions of Americans who bought dark chocolate thinking they were eating something healthy deserve to know what was actually in it.
If you bought Lindt dark chocolate products, especially the Excellence line with 70% cocoa or higher, you likely fall within the class definition.
Start collecting your purchase records now. Watch for a class certification ruling in 2026, which will signal whether this case moves toward settlement. When the claims window opens, do not wait. File as early as possible and stay on top of the deadline.
