The Dodge Chrysler faulty seats lawsuit targets a dangerous defect in certain vehicles where seat backs collapse during rear-end crashes. This failure can hurl drivers or front passengers backward into rear seat occupants, often children, causing catastrophic injuries.
Hundreds of complaints have been filed with the NHTSA over multiple model years. Lawsuits against Stellantis (the parent company of Dodge and Chrysler) argue the automaker knew about the weak seat design and failed to fix it.
In this guide, you will find every affected model, the latest 2026 case updates, who qualifies, how to file a claim, and what kind of payouts to expect. Some individual injury cases have settled for six and seven figures.
If you own a Dodge or Chrysler vehicle made between 2006 and 2023, this information could directly affect you and your family’s safety.
Dodge Chrysler Faulty Seats Lawsuit Overview
The Dodge Chrysler faulty seats lawsuit is a collection of product liability cases alleging that certain Dodge and Chrysler vehicles have seat backs that collapse during rear-end collisions. The core claim is simple: the seats are too weak to protect occupants in a crash.
When a vehicle gets hit from behind, the driver’s or front passenger’s seat should hold firm. In these vehicles, the seat back folds rearward instead. The person in that seat gets thrown toward the back of the car.
That is where children often sit.
Plaintiffs argue that Stellantis, the parent company that absorbed Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA), designed seats using a single recliner mechanism. This design is cheaper to manufacture but lacks the strength of dual recliner systems used by other automakers.
| Key Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Defendant | Stellantis (formerly FCA) |
| Core Allegation | Seat backs collapse in rear impacts |
| Vehicle Brands | Dodge, Chrysler, some Jeep and Ram |
| Model Years | Roughly 2006 to 2023 |
| Lawsuit Type | Product liability, personal injury |
| Primary Risk | Rear seat occupant injuries |
The lawsuits are not just about discomfort or inconvenience. They involve broken spines, traumatic brain injuries, and deaths. These cases allege the automaker chose profit over passenger safety by using an inferior seat design for over a decade.
Think of it like building a chair with one bolt instead of four. It works fine for sitting. But the moment force hits it, the whole thing gives way. That is essentially what plaintiffs say happens in these vehicles.
Dodge Chrysler Lawsuit Update 2026
As of 2026, litigation against Stellantis over faulty seat backs continues to move forward in multiple federal and state courts. Several bellwether trials are expected to reach verdicts or settlements this year.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has been tracking related cases. Consolidation efforts are ongoing as more plaintiffs come forward. Discovery has produced internal documents that plaintiffs say show Stellantis engineers flagged seat strength concerns years before taking action.
Key developments to watch in 2026:
- New NHTSA investigation phases into specific model years
- Bellwether trial selections that could set precedent for future settlements
- Additional recalls potentially expanding the list of affected vehicles
- Expert witness testimony on seat back engineering standards
| 2026 Timeline | Expected Activity |
|---|---|
| Q1 2026 | Discovery deadlines in MDL cases |
| Q2 2026 | Bellwether trial dates expected |
| Q3 2026 | Possible settlement negotiations |
| Q4 2026 | NHTSA investigation updates |
Stellantis has denied wrongdoing in court filings. The company maintains its vehicles meet all federal safety standards, including FMVSS 207, which governs seat back strength. Plaintiffs counter that FMVSS 207 was written in 1967 and has never been meaningfully updated.
That argument carries weight. A standard written before the moon landing may not reflect modern crash dynamics. This gap between outdated regulations and real-world safety is at the heart of the legal battle.
What Is the Dodge Seat Back Failure Lawsuit?
The Dodge seat back failure lawsuit refers to legal claims that Dodge-branded vehicles contain seats prone to collapsing during rear-end crashes. The seat back bends or breaks at the recliner joint, allowing the occupant to slide rearward with dangerous force.
This is not a minor seat adjustment issue. It is a structural failure during the exact moment a seat needs to protect you most.
The lawsuits focus on Dodge’s use of a single-sided recliner mechanism in front seats. Other automakers transitioned to dual recliner systems or integrated seat structures that distribute crash forces more evenly. Dodge continued using the weaker design across multiple vehicle lines.
Injury cases filed under this lawsuit category typically involve:
- Spinal fractures and paralysis from the occupant being thrown backward
- Traumatic brain injuries to rear seat passengers struck by the collapsing seat
- Crush injuries to children seated directly behind the failed seat
- Wrongful death claims where the failure proved fatal
Internal engineering documents, obtained through discovery, reportedly show that crash simulations identified seat back deformation risks. Plaintiffs allege Dodge chose not to upgrade the seat design because of cost.
Each seat upgrade would reportedly cost a small amount per vehicle. Across millions of vehicles, those savings added up to significant profit. Plaintiffs frame this as a classic corporate cost-benefit analysis where consumer safety lost.
Key Takeaway: The Dodge and Chrysler seat lawsuits allege a known, cheaply fixable defect that the automaker ignored for years, putting millions of drivers and rear seat passengers at risk during common rear-end collisions.
Is There a Chrysler Seat Defect Class Action?
A formal, certified class action specifically for Chrysler seat defects has not been established as of early 2026. The litigation primarily proceeds through individual product liability lawsuits and coordinated multidistrict litigation (MDL).
That distinction matters. In a class action, one case represents everyone. In MDL or individual suits, each plaintiff brings their own claim. The practical difference is that individual cases can yield much higher payouts based on specific injuries.
Some attorneys have filed class action complaints seeking certification. Courts have yet to certify a nationwide class for this defect. The challenge is that injuries, vehicle models, and crash circumstances differ widely from case to case.
| Litigation Type | Status | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Class Action | Filed but not certified | Courts reviewing whether a class can be established |
| Individual Lawsuits | Active nationwide | Each plaintiff pursues their own claim |
| MDL (Multidistrict Litigation) | Coordination ongoing | Related cases managed together for efficiency |
| State Court Cases | Active in multiple states | Some plaintiffs file in state rather than federal court |
Even without a certified class, the lawsuits are coordinated. Shared discovery, common expert witnesses, and aligned legal strategies give individual plaintiffs the benefit of group resources.
If a class does get certified in 2026, it would likely cover economic damages like vehicle value loss. Serious injury claims would remain individual because each person’s harm is unique.
Dodge Chrysler Seat Defect Affected Models
The Dodge Chrysler seat defect affects a wide range of vehicles manufactured between approximately 2006 and 2023. Both sedans and SUVs from the Dodge and Chrysler lineups appear in complaints and lawsuits.
Not every vehicle in these model ranges necessarily has the defect. But the seat design architecture shared across FCA platforms means the risk extends broadly.
Here is a breakdown of the most commonly cited vehicles:
| Brand | Model | Affected Years |
|---|---|---|
| Dodge | Charger | 2006 to 2023 |
| Dodge | Challenger | 2008 to 2023 |
| Dodge | Durango | 2011 to 2023 |
| Dodge | Journey | 2009 to 2020 |
| Dodge (Ram) | Ram 1500 | 2009 to 2023 |
| Chrysler | 200 | 2011 to 2017 |
| Chrysler | 300 | 2006 to 2023 |
| Chrysler | Pacifica | 2017 to 2023 |
| Chrysler | Town and Country | 2008 to 2016 |
| Jeep | Grand Cherokee | 2011 to 2023 |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is included because it shares the same FCA platform and seat components. The common thread is the single recliner seat back mechanism used across these vehicles.
If your vehicle appears on this list, check the production date. Complaints cluster most heavily around 2011 to 2020 model years, though earlier and later models are not excluded.
The sheer number of affected vehicles makes this one of the largest seat defect disputes in the auto industry. Millions of these cars and trucks remain on the road today.
Dodge Charger Seat Collapse Lawsuit Details
The Dodge Charger seat collapse lawsuit centers on one of FCA’s best-selling sedans, alleging that Charger front seats fail during rear-end crashes. The Charger, produced from 2006 onward in its modern form, has been a frequent subject of NHTSA complaints for seat issues.
Charger models from 2006 through 2023 appear in legal filings. The vehicle’s popularity among families, law enforcement fleets, and daily commuters means the potential victim pool is massive.
Specific Charger complaints describe:
- Seat back folding flat during moderate rear-end impacts
- Driver launched into rear seat area, striking passengers or child seats
- Recliner mechanism snapping at the pivot point under crash load
- Seat track separation from floor mounts in some cases
One notable case involved a rear-end collision at approximately 35 mph where the driver’s seat collapsed. The driver was propelled into a child car seat. The child suffered severe head injuries.
| Charger Lawsuit Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Most Cited Model Years | 2011 to 2020 |
| Common Crash Type | Rear-end collision, moderate speed |
| Primary Defect Location | Seat back recliner mechanism |
| Injury Severity | Moderate to catastrophic |
The Charger’s seat structure uses stamped steel components in the recliner. Engineers in the litigation have testified that these components yield under forces that a properly designed seat should withstand. The fix, a dual recliner or reinforced bracket, would add minimal cost per vehicle.
Key Takeaway: The Dodge Charger is among the most frequently cited vehicles in seat back failure lawsuits, with complaints spanning nearly two decades of model years and involving injuries from moderate-speed crashes that should be survivable.
Chrysler 200 Defective Seat Lawsuit Explained
The Chrysler 200 defective seat lawsuit targets the midsize sedan produced from 2011 to 2017. Complaints allege that the 200’s front seat backs are structurally inadequate for crash protection, particularly in rear-end impacts.
Chrysler marketed the 200 as an affordable family sedan. That positioning makes the alleged defect especially troubling. Families with children in the back seat face the highest risk when a front seat collapses.
The 200 uses the same FCA seat architecture found across the Dodge and Chrysler lineup. Its recliner mechanism relies on a single pivot point that plaintiffs say cannot handle the energy transferred during a rear collision.
Key facts about Chrysler 200 seat claims:
- Production ended in 2017, but millions remain in use
- Used car buyers may be unaware of the defect history
- No recall has been issued specifically for seat back strength in the 200
- NHTSA complaints describe seat failures at speeds as low as 25 mph
| Chrysler 200 Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Production Years | 2011 to 2017 |
| Seat Type | Single recliner mechanism |
| Recall Status | No specific seat back recall |
| Average Complaint Speed | 25 to 40 mph rear impact |
Because the Chrysler 200 is no longer in production, some owners assume the issue is resolved. It is not. If you still drive a 200 or bought one used, the seat defect remains present. No fix has been issued.
Dodge Ram Seat Defect Lawsuit Claims
The Dodge Ram seat defect lawsuit involves America’s second-best-selling truck line, alleging that Ram 1500 and related models have front seats prone to collapse in crashes. Given the Ram’s massive sales volume, the scope of potential claims is enormous.
Ram trucks, produced under the Dodge brand and later as a standalone Ram brand, share the FCA seat platform. The recliner mechanism in these trucks matches the design found in Dodge sedans and Chrysler vehicles.
Truck crashes carry unique risks. Higher ride height means different impact angles. The greater mass of a truck can amplify forces in a collision. When a seat fails in a truck, the consequences can be severe.
Ram seat defect claims commonly involve:
- Highway speed rear-end collisions where the driver’s seat folds
- Construction zone and traffic stop crashes at moderate speeds
- Commercial fleet vehicles where drivers spend long hours in potentially defective seats
- Towing situations where rear impacts are more likely due to reduced braking distance
| Ram Truck Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Primary Model | Ram 1500 |
| Affected Years | 2009 to 2023 |
| Sales Volume | Over 500,000 units annually |
| Defect Component | Single recliner seat mechanism |
| Unique Risk Factor | Higher mass amplifies crash forces |
Ram trucks often carry passengers on long highway drives. Work crews, families on road trips, and daily commuters all sit behind potentially defective front seats. The sheer number of Ram trucks on American roads makes this a significant public safety concern.
Key Takeaway: From the Charger to the Chrysler 200 to the Ram 1500, the same flawed seat design appears across FCA’s most popular vehicles, putting millions of everyday drivers and their passengers in danger during routine rear-end crashes.
Chrysler Pacifica Seat Back Failure Cases
Chrysler Pacifica seat back failure cases involve the popular minivan produced from 2017 onward. The Pacifica replaced the Town and Country and became Chrysler’s flagship family vehicle, making seat safety especially critical.
Minivans carry families. Children ride in the second and third rows. A front seat that collapses in a crash sends an adult backward into the exact space where kids are buckled in. The physics are straightforward and terrifying.
Pacifica complaints filed with NHTSA describe front seat backs bending rearward during moderate-speed rear impacts. Some complaints report the seat recliner failing even without a collision, simply from normal use over time.
Specific Pacifica concerns include:
- Recliner knob loosening over time, weakening the lock mechanism
- Seat back play or wobble developing within the first few years of ownership
- Complete seat collapse during impacts at city driving speeds
- Stow-and-go seating complexity adding stress points to the seat frame
| Pacifica Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Production Start | 2017 |
| Target Market | Families with children |
| Seat Defect Type | Recliner mechanism failure |
| Unique Concern | Children seated directly behind front seats |
| Complaint Trend | Increasing since 2020 |
The Pacifica’s role as a family hauler makes these allegations especially alarming. Parents choose minivans specifically for safety. If the seats themselves are the weak link, that trust is fundamentally broken.
Seat Back Failure Rear End Collision Injuries
Seat back failure during a rear-end collision causes injuries that are far more severe than what the crash speed alone would suggest. A moderate fender-bender at 30 mph should not cause paralysis, but a collapsing seat changes the equation entirely.
Here is what happens mechanically. The rear-end impact pushes the vehicle forward. The occupant’s body loads against the seat back. If the seat fails, the occupant becomes an unrestrained projectile moving rearward inside the vehicle.
The occupant’s head, torso, and limbs strike rear seat passengers, interior surfaces, or child safety seats. The belt, designed to work with an intact seat, cannot function properly when the seat itself fails.
Common injuries from seat back failures include:
- Spinal cord injuries, including partial and complete paralysis
- Traumatic brain injuries from head strikes against rear passengers or structures
- Cervical fractures from hyperextension as the seat folds
- Internal organ damage from abdominal compression
- Facial fractures and lacerations from contact with rear seat occupants
- Fatal injuries to children struck by collapsing adults
| Injury Type | Severity | Common Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord injury | Catastrophic | Occupant hyperextension during seat collapse |
| Traumatic brain injury | Severe | Head contact with rear passengers or surfaces |
| Crush injuries to children | Severe to fatal | Adult body propelled into child seat area |
| Whiplash and cervical strain | Moderate | Abnormal neck motion during seat failure |
| Internal bleeding | Severe | Torso compression against seat components |
The tragedy is that these injuries happen in crashes people normally walk away from. A properly designed seat absorbs the energy and keeps you in position. A faulty seat turns a survivable crash into a life-altering event.
NHTSA Seat Complaints Against Dodge and Chrysler
The NHTSA has received hundreds of complaints about seat defects in Dodge and Chrysler vehicles. These complaints, filed by real owners, describe seat back failures, recliner malfunctions, and seat track separations across multiple model years.
NHTSA complaint data is public record. Anyone can search the database by make, model, and component. Searching “seat” complaints for Dodge and Chrysler reveals a pattern that spans years and models.
Notable complaint patterns include:
- Cluster of reports between 2015 and 2022 for Charger and Challenger seats
- Increasing Pacifica complaints starting around 2020
- Ram 1500 seat complaints spiking after 2017 model year changes
- Chrysler 300 reports dating back to the 2006 redesign
| NHTSA Data Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| Total Seat-Related Complaints (Dodge) | Several hundred across all models |
| Total Seat-Related Complaints (Chrysler) | Over 100 filed |
| Most Common Component | Seat back and recliner mechanism |
| Investigation Status | Active review, no formal recall for seat strength |
| Complaint Period | 2006 to present |
The NHTSA has opened investigations into specific models but has not forced a recall specifically for seat back strength. Plaintiffs in the lawsuits argue the agency’s failure to act stems from the outdated FMVSS 207 standard, which tests seat strength under conditions that do not reflect real-world rear-end crashes.
Filing a NHTSA complaint yourself strengthens the public record. Each complaint adds data that supports both regulatory action and legal claims.
Key Takeaway: NHTSA complaint data reveals a long-standing, well-documented pattern of seat failures across Dodge and Chrysler vehicles, giving plaintiffs substantial evidence that the automaker knew or should have known about the defect for years.
Chrysler Dodge Seat Injury Claims and Evidence
Chrysler Dodge seat injury claims require specific evidence to succeed. Plaintiffs must prove the seat was defective, that the defect caused their injuries, and that Stellantis is responsible for the design flaw.
Building a strong case involves more than just medical records. Attorneys gather engineering evidence, vehicle inspection reports, and internal company documents to show the seat failed because of its design, not because of extraordinary circumstances.
Essential evidence for a seat injury claim:
- Vehicle inspection report showing the seat back collapsed or deformed
- Crash reconstruction analysis demonstrating the impact speed and angle
- Medical records linking injuries directly to the seat failure
- Photographs of the vehicle interior showing seat position after the crash
- NHTSA complaint history for the same vehicle model
- Expert engineering testimony comparing the seat design to industry standards
- Internal company documents obtained through discovery
| Evidence Type | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Vehicle inspection | Proves the seat physically failed |
| Crash reconstruction | Shows the crash was survivable with a proper seat |
| Medical records | Connects injuries to the specific failure mode |
| Engineering expert | Explains why the design is deficient |
| Company documents | Demonstrates knowledge of the defect |
Time is critical for preserving evidence. If your vehicle was in a crash and the seat collapsed or moved abnormally, do not repair or dispose of the vehicle without documenting the seat condition. Photographs, video, and professional inspection reports should be obtained as soon as possible.
The strongest cases combine physical evidence with the paper trail inside Stellantis. Internal memos, test results, and cost analyses can show the company weighed safety against profit.
Who Qualifies for the Dodge Seat Lawsuit?
You may qualify for the Dodge seat lawsuit if you were injured in a Dodge or Chrysler vehicle when the seat back collapsed or failed during a crash. Both drivers and passengers, including rear seat occupants struck by a collapsing seat, can file claims.
Qualification depends on several factors. Not every Dodge or Chrysler owner automatically has a case. The key is whether the seat defect caused or worsened your injuries.
General qualification criteria:
- You were in a crash involving an affected Dodge or Chrysler vehicle
- The front seat collapsed, folded, or moved abnormally during impact
- You suffered injuries connected to the seat failure
- Your vehicle falls within the affected model years (roughly 2006 to 2023)
- You have documentation of the crash, injuries, and vehicle condition
| Qualification Factor | Details |
|---|---|
| Vehicle ownership | Owner, driver, or passenger in affected vehicle |
| Crash involvement | Must have been in a collision (typically rear-end) |
| Seat failure | Seat back must have collapsed, bent, or malfunctioned |
| Injury connection | Injuries must be linked to the seat defect |
| Statute of limitations | Varies by state, typically 2 to 4 years from injury |
Family members of someone killed due to a seat back failure may file wrongful death claims. Parents of children injured in the rear seat often have the strongest emotional and legal standing.
The statute of limitations varies by state. In most states, you have 2 to 4 years from the date of injury. Some states have shorter windows. Waiting too long can permanently bar your claim.
How to File a Dodge Chrysler Seat Claim
Filing a Dodge Chrysler seat claim starts with contacting a product liability attorney who handles auto defect cases. Most attorneys offering representation in these cases work on contingency, meaning you pay nothing upfront.
The process is more straightforward than most people expect. Here is a step-by-step breakdown of what to do.
Step 1: Preserve your evidence. Do not repair, sell, or scrap the vehicle. Take photos of the seat, the interior, and all exterior damage. Save all medical records and bills.
Step 2: File a NHTSA complaint. Document the seat failure through the NHTSA online complaint system. This creates an official record and strengthens both your case and the public safety record.
Step 3: Contact an attorney. Look for law firms with experience in auto product liability or seat defect cases. Provide them with your crash details, vehicle information, and medical documentation.
Step 4: Case evaluation. The attorney reviews your evidence, determines if the seat defect contributed to your injuries, and advises you on the strength of your claim.
Step 5: Legal filing. If the case has merit, the attorney files a lawsuit or joins your claim to existing litigation against Stellantis.
| Filing Step | Action Required |
|---|---|
| Evidence preservation | Photograph vehicle and seat, save medical records |
| NHTSA complaint | File online at NHTSA’s complaint portal |
| Attorney consultation | Contact a product liability law firm |
| Case evaluation | Attorney reviews evidence and advises |
| Claim filing | Lawsuit filed in appropriate court |
Most consultations are free. The contingency fee structure means the attorney gets paid only if you receive a settlement or verdict. Typical contingency fees range from 33% to 40% of the recovery.
Key Takeaway: Filing a seat defect claim involves preserving physical evidence, documenting the failure through NHTSA, and working with a product liability attorney who handles these cases on a contingency basis with no upfront cost to you.
Faulty Seat Back Lawsuit Settlement Expectations
Faulty seat back lawsuit settlements vary dramatically based on injury severity, the strength of evidence, and whether the case goes to trial or settles before. Minor injury cases settle for far less than cases involving paralysis or death.
There is no single settlement amount for these cases. Each claim is evaluated individually. The automaker’s willingness to settle often depends on how many cases are pending and what trial verdicts have established.
Historical seat back failure verdicts and settlements in the auto industry provide some context:
| Outcome Type | Estimated Range | Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Minor injuries (soft tissue) | $25,000 to $150,000 | Whiplash, strains from seat movement |
| Moderate injuries (fractures) | $150,000 to $750,000 | Broken bones, herniated discs |
| Severe injuries (spinal cord) | $1,000,000 to $10,000,000+ | Paralysis, permanent disability |
| Wrongful death | $2,000,000 to $20,000,000+ | Fatal injuries from seat collapse |
| Punitive damages | Varies widely | Awarded when company conduct is egregious |
These ranges draw from seat back failure cases across the auto industry, not just Dodge and Chrysler. Actual results in Stellantis cases will depend on the specific facts presented.
Punitive damages are possible if plaintiffs prove Stellantis knew the seats were dangerous and chose not to fix them. Internal documents showing cost-benefit analyses that prioritized savings over safety can trigger punitive awards.
Think of it like a restaurant that knows its food storage is unsafe but keeps serving customers to save money on refrigeration. When people get sick, the law does not just compensate the victims. It punishes the restaurant for knowingly cutting corners. Punitive damages work the same way.
Settlement negotiations typically begin after discovery is complete and trial dates are set. Companies like Stellantis often prefer to settle before a jury hears the evidence.
Dodge Chrysler Seat Lawsuit Payout Estimates
Dodge Chrysler seat lawsuit payout estimates depend on whether your case involves physical injury, property damage, or both. Injury cases command the highest payouts, while property-only claims (vehicle value loss) are significantly lower.
For individuals with documented injuries from a seat back failure, payouts in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars are realistic. The more severe and permanent the injury, the higher the expected compensation.
Payout categories typically break down as follows:
- Medical expenses: Past and future treatment costs related to the injury
- Lost wages: Income lost during recovery and any reduction in earning capacity
- Pain and suffering: Compensation for physical pain and emotional distress
- Loss of quality of life: For permanent disabilities that change daily living
- Wrongful death damages: Funeral costs, lost support, and loss of companionship
| Payout Component | What It Covers |
|---|---|
| Medical costs | Surgeries, rehab, ongoing care |
| Lost income | Time off work, career impact |
| Pain and suffering | Physical and emotional harm |
| Future care needs | Long-term medical requirements |
| Punitive damages | Punishment for corporate misconduct |
If the litigation results in a class action settlement for non-injury claims (like vehicle depreciation), those payouts tend to be much smaller. Class members in such settlements might receive a few hundred to a few thousand dollars each.
The real money is in individual injury cases. A parent whose child was paralyzed by a collapsing seat could receive a multimillion-dollar verdict. An adult with a herniated disc might settle in the mid-six figures. Each case turns on its own facts.
Dodge Seat Recall 2026: What You Need to Know
As of 2026, no formal recall has been issued specifically for seat back strength defects in Dodge vehicles. Stellantis has issued seat-related recalls for other issues, such as loose bolts and seat track problems, but not for the structural adequacy of the seat back recliner mechanism.
That distinction is important. A recall for a loose bolt is not the same as a recall for a fundamentally weak seat design. Plaintiffs argue the entire seat architecture needs redesigning, not just minor component fixes.
Recent seat-related recalls and technical service bulletins include:
- Seat track bolt recalls affecting certain Ram trucks
- Seat heater wiring recalls for fire risk in some Chrysler models
- Seat position sensor recalls related to airbag deployment
- Technical service bulletins for seat recliner noise and looseness
| Recall Type | Models Affected | Issue | Does It Fix Seat Back Strength? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat track bolts | Ram 1500 (select years) | Loose mounting bolts | No |
| Seat heater wiring | Chrysler 300, 200 | Fire risk from wiring | No |
| Seat position sensor | Multiple FCA models | Airbag deployment error | No |
| TSB for recliner noise | Charger, Challenger | Recliner looseness | Partially addresses symptom |
Consumer advocacy groups, including the Center for Auto Safety, have petitioned NHTSA to open a formal investigation into seat back strength across the FCA vehicle lineup. A full investigation could lead to a mandatory recall.
If a recall is issued in 2026, affected owners would receive free repairs. Until then, the only recourse is through the legal system. Owners should monitor NHTSA’s recall database and sign up for notifications for their specific vehicle.
Key Takeaway: Despite years of complaints and lawsuits, no recall specifically addresses the seat back strength defect in Dodge and Chrysler vehicles as of 2026, leaving millions of owners without a manufacturer-provided fix and relying on the court system for accountability.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Dodge Chrysler faulty seats lawsuit about?
The lawsuit alleges that certain Dodge and Chrysler vehicles have seat backs that collapse during rear-end crashes.
The defect involves a weak single recliner mechanism that cannot withstand crash forces.
Plaintiffs claim Stellantis knew about the problem and failed to fix it.
Which Dodge and Chrysler models have defective seats?
Affected models include the Dodge Charger, Challenger, Durango, Journey, Ram 1500, Chrysler 200, 300, Pacifica, and Town and Country.
Model years generally range from 2006 to 2023.
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is sometimes included due to shared seat components.
How much money can I get from the seat defect lawsuit?
Payouts range from $25,000 for minor injuries to over $10 million for catastrophic injuries like paralysis.
The amount depends on your specific injuries, medical costs, and strength of evidence.
Wrongful death cases can result in even higher awards.
What is the deadline to file a Dodge seat claim in 2026?
The deadline depends on your state’s statute of limitations, which typically ranges from 2 to 4 years after the injury.
Some states have shorter deadlines.
Contact an attorney as soon as possible to confirm your specific filing window.
Has Dodge or Chrysler recalled vehicles for faulty seats?
No recall has been issued specifically for seat back strength defects as of 2026.
Some seat-related recalls exist for other issues like loose bolts and wiring.
Consumer groups continue to push NHTSA for a comprehensive seat back recall.
This lawsuit is not going away. If anything, it is gaining momentum as more evidence surfaces and more families come forward. The defect affects vehicles that millions of Americans drive every day.
Check whether your vehicle is on the affected models list. If you were in a crash where the seat collapsed or moved abnormally, gather your evidence now.
The window to act has limits. State deadlines vary, and evidence degrades over time. Getting your claim on file in 2026 puts you in the strongest possible position.









